John Snell

1.2k citations
38 papers · 930 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

John Snell

37 papers receiving 910 citations

Peers

John Snell
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 444
  • Neurology 192
  • Biomedical Engineering 593
  • Neurology 43
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 47
Replace P. Jason White with:
P. Jason White United States
Sagi Harnof Israel
Mohamad Khaled United States
Matthew Eames United States
Johanna Loomba United States
Stephen J. Monteith United States
Priya Bansal United States
Ali H. Mesiwala United States
Tsang‐Wei Tu United States
Michael Finsterwald Switzerland
John Snell relative to P. Jason White United States P. Jason White's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
P. Jason White · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Snell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Snell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Snell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Snell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Snell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Snell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Snell. The network helps show where John Snell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Snell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Snell Line = papers co-authored together John Snell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013124
2 201284
3 201870
4 201262
5 201554
6 201248
7 201647
8 201345
9 202138
10 201337
11 199336
12 201431
13 201927
14 202227
15 201425
16 202224
17 202123
18 202018
19 202017
20 202113

About John Snell

John Snell is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 930 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (24 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (14 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (7 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers), Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (444 citations), Neurology (192 citations), Biomedical Engineering (593 citations), Neurology (43 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (47 citations). John Snell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Neal F. Kassell, Matthew Eames, Stephen J. Monteith, Max Wintermark, Jason P. Sheehan, Jean‐François Aubry, W. Jeff Elias, Ricky Medel, David Moore and G. Wilson Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of neurosurgery, Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, Scientific Reports, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact