Matthew D. Egbert

36 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers

Matthew D. Egbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 205
  • History and Philosophy of Science 33
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 98
  • Social Psychology 89
  • Philosophy 35
Replace Simon McGregor with:
Simon McGregor United Kingdom
Marc van Duijn Netherlands
Erik P. Hoel United States
Yukio-Pegio Gunji Japan
Conor Heins Germany
Argyris Arnellos Greece
Franciso Calvo Garzón Spain
Nathaniel Virgo Japan
Arantza Etxeberría Spain
Alvaro Moreno Bergareche Spain
Matthew D. Egbert relative to Simon McGregor United Kingdom Simon McGregor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Simon McGregor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew D. Egbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew D. Egbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew D. Egbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew D. Egbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew D. Egbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew D. Egbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew D. Egbert. The network helps show where Matthew D. Egbert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew D. Egbert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew D. Egbert Line = papers co-authored together Matthew D. Egbert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201376
2 201457
3 201055
4 201932
5 201327
6 201125
7 201123
8 200919
9 201111
10 201610
11 20139
12 20149
13 20238
14 20196
15 20186
16 20216
17 20195
18
Behavioral Metabolution - Metabolism Based Behavior Enables New Forms of Adaptation and Evolution.
20105
19 20195
20 20185

About Matthew D. Egbert

Matthew D. Egbert is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Molecular Biology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 38 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Origins and Evolution of Life (15 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (13 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (8 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (7 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (205 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (33 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (98 citations), Social Psychology (89 citations) and Philosophy (35 citations). Matthew D. Egbert has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Xabier E. Barandiaran, Ezequiel Alejandro Di Paolo, Tom Froese, Juan Pérez‐Mercader, Nathaniel Virgo, Shraddha Shitut, Samay Pande, Christian Kost, Bashar Ibrahim and Gerd Gruenert. Their work appears in journals such as Artificial Life, Frontiers in Neurorobotics, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, Adaptive Behavior and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact