Matthew Booth

13 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Matthew Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 84
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 131
  • Building and Construction 58
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 16
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 16
Replace Robert Burns with:
Robert Burns United States
Jagadeeshkumar Kulandaivelu Australia
André Dufresne Canada
Xiaoyan Sun Australia
Michał Michałkiewicz Poland
Atsushi Mizukoshi Japan
Urban Svedberg Sweden
Mansour Rezazadeh Azari Iran
Tetsuo Takakuwa Japan
Yanling Wang China
Matthew Booth relative to Robert Burns United States Robert Burns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert Burns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Booth. The network helps show where Matthew Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Booth Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200688
2 200652
3 202144
4 200644
5 200239
6 201219
7 201211
8 20219
9 20237
10 20135
11 20243
12 20202
13
Predictive Factors for Intraoperative Determination for the Need of Femoral Osteochondroplasty After Periacetabular Osteotomy for Acetabular Dysplasia.
20241

About Matthew Booth

Matthew Booth is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Surgery, Process Chemistry and Technology, Building and Construction and Infectious Diseases, having authored 13 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Landfill Environmental Impact Studies (4 papers), Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance (3 papers), Odor and Emission Control Technologies (3 papers), Municipal Solid Waste Management (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (2 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (1 paper) and Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (84 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (131 citations), Building and Construction (58 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (16 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (16 citations). Matthew Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Gabriel Bitton, Timothy G. Townsend, Qiyong Xu, Paul A. Chadik, Sue Lee, Richard J. Melker, Anna Gardner, Gabriela Ghita, Philip A. Efron and Brian Quinn. Their work appears in journals such as AIDS and Behavior, Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, The Journal of Arthroplasty and Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact