Matteo Danielis

56 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers

Matteo Danielis
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Research and Theory 26
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 56
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 14
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 36
  • Health Informatics 10
Replace April N. Kapu with:
April N. Kapu United States
Irena Anna Frei Switzerland
Paulo Carlos Garcia Brazil
Mary E. Johantgen United States
Lou Ann Montgomery United States
Laura R. Brosch United States
Susan Klaus United States
Daniela Lehwaldt Ireland
M. Blegen United States
Cédric Mabire Switzerland
Matteo Danielis relative to April N. Kapu United States April N. Kapu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
April N. Kapu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matteo Danielis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matteo Danielis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matteo Danielis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matteo Danielis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matteo Danielis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matteo Danielis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matteo Danielis. The network helps show where Matteo Danielis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matteo Danielis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matteo Danielis Line = papers co-authored together Matteo Danielis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202150
2 202041
3 202035
4 201921
5 202017
6 201917
7 202215
8 201914
9 202014
10 201814
11 202012
12 202512
13 201810
14 20249
15 20209
16 20218
17 20218
18 20168
19 20217
20 20247

About Matteo Danielis

Matteo Danielis is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Research and Theory, having authored 66 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (7 papers), Nursing education and management (5 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (3 papers) and Body Composition Measurement Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (26 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (56 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (14 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (36 citations) and Health Informatics (10 citations). Matteo Danielis has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alvisa Palese, Elisa Mattiussi, Stefano Terzoni, Anne Destrebecq, Amato De Monte, Jessica Longhini, Stavros Vryonides, Walter Sermeus, Evridiki Papastavrou and Stefano Fabris. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Contemporary Nurse and Nursing in Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact