Mathieu Piché

2.5k citations
92 papers · 1.9k · h-index 23

Impact in

    • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Neural dynamics and brain function
    • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Papers in

Mathieu Piché

89 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Mathieu Piché
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 659
  • Pharmacology 494
  • Physiology 616
  • Gastroenterology 102
  • Sensory Systems 80
Replace M. Catherine Bushnell with:
M. Catherine Bushnell Canada
Jason G. Craggs United States
David M. Niddam Taiwan
Susanna Bantick United Kingdom
Robert K. Hofbauer United States
Michael Valet Germany
Irit Weissman‐Fogel Israel
Massieh Moayedi Canada
Y. Sosa United States
Eszter Schoell Germany
Mathieu Piché relative to M. Catherine Bushnell Canada M. Catherine Bushnell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
M. Catherine Bushnell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathieu Piché

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathieu Piché's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathieu Piché with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathieu Piché more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathieu Piché

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathieu Piché. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathieu Piché. The network helps show where Mathieu Piché may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathieu Piché, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathieu Piché Line = papers co-authored together Mathieu Piché links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009194
2 2009125
3 200997
4 201166
5 201061
6 201360
7 201152
8 201350
9 200848
10 200446
11 200745
12 201241
13 202138
14 201837
15 201235
16 199335
17 201334
18 201432
19 200329
20 201728

About Mathieu Piché

Mathieu Piché is a scholar working on Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Neurology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (43 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (35 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (24 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (9 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (7 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (6 papers) and Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (659 citations), Pharmacology (494 citations), Physiology (616 citations), Gastroenterology (102 citations) and Sensory Systems (80 citations). Mathieu Piché has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Japan and France. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Rainville, Marianne Arsenault, Martin Descarreaux, Jen-I Chen, Mathieu Roy, Mickaël Bouin, Isabelle Peretz, Jean-Daniel Dubois, Pierre Poitras and Gilles Bronchti. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience, Pain, Journal of Pain, European Journal of Neuroscience and Neuroscience Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact