Mathieu d’Acremont

2.3k citations
23 papers · 1.7k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Mathieu d’Acremont

23 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Mathieu d’Acremont
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Applied Psychology 215
  • General Decision Sciences 80
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 463
  • Clinical Psychology 692
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 411
Replace Matthew J. Gullo with:
Matthew J. Gullo Australia
Damien Brevers Belgium
Ayca Coskunpinar United States
Benjamin M. Dykman United States
Sarah J Getz United States
Ruth J. van Holst Netherlands
Javier Moltó Spain
Lotte F. van Dillen Netherlands
Sarah L. Lake United States
Miguel Kazén Germany
Mathieu d’Acremont relative to Matthew J. Gullo Australia Matthew J. Gullo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Matthew J. Gullo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathieu d’Acremont

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathieu d’Acremont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathieu d’Acremont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathieu d’Acremont more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathieu d’Acremont

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathieu d’Acremont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathieu d’Acremont. The network helps show where Mathieu d’Acremont may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathieu d’Acremont, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathieu d’Acremont Line = papers co-authored together Mathieu d’Acremont links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006251
2 2006179
3 2006167
4 2006151
5 2008138
6 2007135
7 200881
8 200579
9 200969
10 200567
11 200867
12 201350
13 200646
14 200846
15 200834
16 200633
17 200830
18 200827
19 201622
20 201320

About Mathieu d’Acremont

Mathieu d’Acremont is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (215 citations), General Decision Sciences (80 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (463 citations), Clinical Psychology (692 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (411 citations). Mathieu d’Acremont has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Martial Van der Linden, Ariane Zermatten, Françoise Jermann, Joël Billieux, Peter Bossaerts, Antoine Bechara, Philippe Gay, Grazia Ceschi, Lucien Rochat and Catherine Hanak. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Psychopharmacology, Memory, Personality and Individual Differences and Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact