Mateja Peter

511 citations
20 papers · 236 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Mateja Peter

18 papers receiving 211 citations

Peers

Mateja Peter
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Development 56
  • Political Science and International Relations 160
  • Sociology and Political Science 205
  • Gender Studies 19
  • General Social Sciences 4
Replace Charles T. Hunt with:
Charles T. Hunt Australia
Dipali Mukhopadhyay United States
Mark Sedra Canada
Andreas T. Hirblinger Switzerland
Sara Hellmüller Switzerland
Emily Paddon Rhoads United States
SungYong Lee New Zealand
Suthaharan Nadarajah United Kingdom
Sadako Ogata Switzerland
Geoffrey Swenson United Kingdom
Mateja Peter relative to Charles T. Hunt Australia Charles T. Hunt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Charles T. Hunt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mateja Peter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mateja Peter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mateja Peter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mateja Peter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mateja Peter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mateja Peter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mateja Peter. The network helps show where Mateja Peter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Mateja Peter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mateja Peter Line = papers co-authored together Mateja Peter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201843
2 201541
3 201637
4 201334
5 202127
6 201815
7 201812
8 20195
9
Measuring the Success of Peace Operations: Directions in Academic Literature
20164
10
The EU's Crisis Management in the Kosovo-Serbia crises
20173
11
The EU and international actors in Kosovo: Competing institutional logics, constructive ambiguity and competing priorities
20183
12 20233
13 20172
14 20112
15
Emerging powers and peace operations: An agenda for research
20142
16 20241
17 20201
18 20211
19 20210
20 20250

About Mateja Peter

Mateja Peter is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Development, Infectious Diseases and Philosophy, having authored 20 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Peace and Security Dynamics (16 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (13 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (5 papers), Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (3 papers), Global Security and Public Health (3 papers), International Law and Human Rights (2 papers), International Development and Aid (2 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (56 citations), Political Science and International Relations (160 citations), Sociology and Political Science (205 citations), Gender Studies (19 citations) and General Social Sciences (4 citations). Mateja Peter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Cedric de Coning, Francesco Strazzari and Jozef Bátora. Their work appears in journals such as International Peacekeeping, European Security, Third World Quarterly, Cambridge Review of International Affairs and Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact