Massimo Menga

12 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Massimo Menga
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 245
  • Neurology 107
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 127
  • Oncology 91
  • Genetics 35
Replace Chiara Coriani with:
Chiara Coriani Italy
Coreline N. Burggraaff Netherlands
Cristina Piva Italy
Julia Arfi‐Rouche France
Chiara Iacconi Italy
Saskia Vande Perre France
Salma Moalla France
Shih‐Li Chao Belgium
Derek Hyde Canada
Hie Bum Suh South Korea
Massimo Menga relative to Chiara Coriani Italy Chiara Coriani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Chiara Coriani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Massimo Menga

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Massimo Menga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Massimo Menga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Massimo Menga more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Massimo Menga

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Massimo Menga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Massimo Menga. The network helps show where Massimo Menga may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Massimo Menga, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Massimo Menga Line = papers co-authored together Massimo Menga links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2012168
2 201852
3 201933
4 201822
5 200911
6 20177
7 19944
8 20234
9
Using PET-CT in the restaging of primitive mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) after chemotherapy: which criteria should we use?
20153
10 20142
11 19971
12 20171
13 20220

About Massimo Menga

Massimo Menga is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Genetics and Neurology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery (1 paper) and Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (245 citations), Neurology (107 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (127 citations), Oncology (91 citations) and Genetics (35 citations). Massimo Menga has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marco Ladetto, Annibale Versari, Umberto Vitolo, Roberto Passera, Marilena Bellò, Annalisa Chiappella, Francesca Giunta, Giorgio Limerutti, Silvia Franceschetti and Barbara Botto. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Ophthalmologica, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine and EJNMMI Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact