Mary Proctor

61 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Mary Proctor
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Internal Medicine 1.6k
  • Emergency Medical Services 455
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 203
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 576
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 650
Replace James Stephen Jenkins with:
James Stephen Jenkins United States
David Green United States
Jamal Jawad Hoballah Lebanon
Cynthia K. Shortell United States
Maxine Clarke United Kingdom
Erich Minar Austria
Markus Haumer Austria
Michael J. Rohrer United States
Knut Kröger Germany
Yuanhua Yang China
Mary Proctor relative to James Stephen Jenkins United States James Stephen Jenkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James Stephen Jenkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Proctor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Proctor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Proctor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Proctor. The network helps show where Mary Proctor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Proctor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Proctor Line = papers co-authored together Mary Proctor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006339
2 2007255
3 1997186
4 1996154
5 2003147
6 2000142
7 2004125
8 1991112
9 1993102
10 200597
11 200684
12 200181
13 200677
14 200177
15 199475
16 200075
17 199969
18 199863
19 200261
20 199459

About Mary Proctor

Mary Proctor is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medical Services and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 65 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (37 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (6 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (5 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (4 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (4 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (3 papers) and Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (1.6k citations), Emergency Medical Services (455 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (203 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (576 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (650 citations). Mary Proctor has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lazar John Greenfield, Peter K. Henke, James C. Stanley, Gilbert R. Upchurch, Mark D. Cipolle, Thomas W. Wakefield, Jorge L. Rodríguez, Lazar J. Greenfield, Fred A. Luchette and David M. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, Annals of Surgery, Surgery, Environmental Health Perspectives and Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact