Mary Pickering
Impact in
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History
- Philosophy and History of Science
- General Psychology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 4
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
-
- Legal and Social Philosophy 15
- Co-authors
- Michel Bourdeau (2 shared papers)James Smith Allen (1 shared paper)Gillis J. Harp (1 shared paper)Michael R. Hill (1 shared paper)Robert Perrin (1 shared paper)Warren Schmaus (1 shared paper)Dominick LaCapra (1 shared paper)Auguste Comte (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (2 papers)Science (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)The Canadian Journal of Sociology (1 paper)French Historical Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mary Pickering
21 papers receiving 234 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- History and Philosophy of Science 67
- General Psychology 15
- History 63
- Philosophy 57
- Theoretical Computer Science 6
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Pickering
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Pickering's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Pickering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Pickering more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Pickering
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Pickering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Pickering. The network helps show where Mary Pickering may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Mary Pickering, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 178 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 51 | |
| 3 | Love, Order, and Progress: The Science, Philosophy, and Politics of Auguste Comte | 2018 | 42 |
| 4 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 1 |
About Mary Pickering
Mary Pickering is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, History and Philosophy, having authored 25 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal and Social Philosophy (15 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (3 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Political Theory and Influence (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (2 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (67 citations), General Psychology (15 citations), History (63 citations), Philosophy (57 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (6 citations). Mary Pickering has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michel Bourdeau, James Smith Allen, Gillis J. Harp, Michael R. Hill, Robert Perrin, Warren Schmaus, Dominick LaCapra and Auguste Comte. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Science, The American Historical Review, The Canadian Journal of Sociology and French Historical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.