Mary Mitchell

45 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

Mary Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 108
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 73
  • Leadership and Management 7
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 95
Replace Carole Schroeder with:
Carole Schroeder United States
Tony G. Egan New Zealand
Mary Nolan United Kingdom
Gamze Teskereci Türkiye
Yeşim Aksoy Derya Türkiye
Adriane María Netto de Oliveira Brazil
Sadie Geraghty Australia
Irena Madjar Australia
Meltem Kürtüncü Türkiye
Claire Brown Australia
Mary Mitchell relative to Carole Schroeder United States Carole Schroeder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.7×
Carole Schroeder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Mitchell. The network helps show where Mary Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Mary Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Mary Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199449
2 200632
3 200628
4 200725
5 201324
6 201023
7 201920
8 200418
9 200818
10 200717
11 201616
12 201716
13 202316
14 201412
15 199711
16 202211
17 201110
18 201310
19 20209
20 20207

About Mary Mitchell

Mary Mitchell is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Public Administration, having authored 48 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (11 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (8 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Legal and Social Justice Studies (4 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers) and Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (108 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (73 citations), Leadership and Management (7 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (95 citations). Mary Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Hall, Stuart McClean, Katherine C. Pollard, Laura Lundy, Julie H. Williams, Fiona Morrison, Viviene E. Cree, Debra Salmon, Julie Williams and John Devaney. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education in Practice, The British Journal of Social Work, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, Women and Birth and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact