Mary Jo Wright
Impact in
- Oncology top 5%
- Lymphatic System and Diseases
- Cancer survivorship and care
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Kimberly J. Van Zee (3 shared papers)Michelle R. Sampson (2 shared papers)Katherine Teresa Morris (2 shared papers)Julia P. Brockway (2 shared papers)Elyn Riedel (2 shared papers)Sarah A. McLaughlin (2 shared papers)Karen E. Hurley (2 shared papers)Gladys L. Giron (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (2 papers)BMC Cancer (1 paper)Cell Transplantation (1 paper)Journal of the American College of Surgeons (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Mary Jo Wright
34 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Oncology 555
- Cancer Research 248
- Clinical Psychology 199
- Surgery 277
- Emergency Medicine 48
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Jo Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Jo Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Jo Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Jo Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Jo Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Jo Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Jo Wright. The network helps show where Mary Jo Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Jo Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 529 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 212 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 190 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 82 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 40 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 34 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 33 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 26 | |
| 15 | 1982 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 13 |
About Mary Jo Wright
Mary Jo Wright is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Biotechnology, Health Information Management and Cancer Research, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (9 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (4 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (2 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (2 papers), Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation (2 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (2 papers) and Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (555 citations), Cancer Research (248 citations), Clinical Psychology (199 citations), Surgery (277 citations) and Emergency Medicine (48 citations). Mary Jo Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kimberly J. Van Zee, Michelle R. Sampson, Katherine Teresa Morris, Julia P. Brockway, Elyn Riedel, Sarah A. McLaughlin, Karen E. Hurley, Gladys L. Giron, Charles H. Zeanah and Michael S. Scheeringa. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Journal of Clinical Oncology, BMC Cancer, Cell Transplantation and Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.