Marta Cavo
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 10%
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Papers in
-
- 3D Printing in Biomedical Research 4
- Bone Tissue Engineering Materials 3
-
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 2
- Co-authors
- Silvia Scaglione (4 shared papers)Marco Fato (2 shared papers)Francesco Beltrame (2 shared papers)Roberto Raiteri (1 shared paper)Annj Zamuner (1 shared paper)Grazia M. L. Messina (1 shared paper)Monica Dettin (1 shared paper)Giovanni Marletta (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (2 papers)Small (1 paper)Materials Science and Engineering C (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Materials (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Marta Cavo
6 papers receiving 413 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Biomaterials 107
- Biomedical Engineering 304
- Cell Biology 102
- Molecular Medicine 29
- Oncology 119
Countries citing papers authored by Marta Cavo
This map shows the geographic impact of Marta Cavo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marta Cavo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marta Cavo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marta Cavo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marta Cavo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marta Cavo. The network helps show where Marta Cavo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Marta Cavo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 172 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 124 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 6 |
About Marta Cavo
Marta Cavo is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Biomaterials, Oncology, Cell Biology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 6 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (4 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (3 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (2 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (2 papers), Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications (1 paper), Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (1 paper) and Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (107 citations), Biomedical Engineering (304 citations), Cell Biology (102 citations), Molecular Medicine (29 citations) and Oncology (119 citations). Marta Cavo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Silvia Scaglione, Marco Fato, Francesco Beltrame, Roberto Raiteri, Annj Zamuner, Grazia M. L. Messina, Monica Dettin, Giovanni Marletta, Antonio Gloria and Teresa Russo. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Small, Materials Science and Engineering C, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.