Mark W. Risjord

48 papers receiving 703 citations

Peers

Mark W. Risjord
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Research and Theory 78
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 38
  • History and Philosophy of Science 104
  • Pharmacy 25
  • Cultural Studies 65
Replace Margaret Stacey with:
Margaret Stacey United Kingdom
Nancy J. Tomes United States
Rosemarie Putnam Tong United States
Joel M. Charon
Stan van Hooft Australia
Barbara M Grant New Zealand
Abraham Flexner
Luigina Mortari Italy
Arantxa Ugartetxea Arrieta
Xabier Mendiguren
Mark W. Risjord relative to Margaret Stacey United Kingdom Margaret Stacey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.8×
Margaret Stacey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark W. Risjord

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark W. Risjord's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark W. Risjord with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark W. Risjord more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark W. Risjord

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark W. Risjord. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark W. Risjord. The network helps show where Mark W. Risjord may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mark W. Risjord, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark W. Risjord Line = papers co-authored together Mark W. Risjord links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009139
2 2012105
3
Nursing Knowledge: Science, Practice, and Philosophy
200973
4 200259
5 200154
6 201451
7
Philosophy of anthropology and sociology
200732
8 200731
9 201430
10 200922
11 201820
12 201316
13 201812
14 202012
15 199211
16 200511
17 200210
18 19908
19 20008
20
Handbook of Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology
20067

About Mark W. Risjord

Mark W. Risjord is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Research and Theory, Anthropology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 54 papers that have together received 794 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (24 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Critical Realism in Sociology (9 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (8 papers), Nursing education and management (7 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (5 papers) and Medicine, History, and Philosophy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (78 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (38 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (104 citations), Pharmacy (25 citations) and Cultural Studies (65 citations). Mark W. Risjord has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Margaret F. Moloney, Sandra Barker Dunbar, Stephen Turner, Kareem Khalifa, Dorit Bar‐On, Judith B. Greenberg, Phillip Cary, David K. Henderson, Kathleen Marie Higgins and Robert Kane. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Nursing Philosophy, Philosophy of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A and Frontiers in Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact