Mark Vrabel

17 papers receiving 743 citations

Mark Vrabel's Hit Papers

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2015 · 495 citations
4950+3+7Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Mark Vrabel
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
  • Research and Theory 4
  • Oncology 78
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 63
  • Gastroenterology 14
Replace Huiqin Yang with:
Huiqin Yang United Kingdom
Ílker Etikán Türkiye
Muhammad Anwar Khan Saudi Arabia
Nakul Saxena Singapore
Martin Gellerstedt Sweden
Susanne Coleman United Kingdom
Janis Glover United States
Eva Turk Slovenia
Petra A. Wark United Kingdom
Feifei Huang China
Mark Vrabel relative to Huiqin Yang United Kingdom Huiqin Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Huiqin Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Vrabel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Vrabel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Vrabel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Vrabel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Vrabel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Vrabel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Vrabel. The network helps show where Mark Vrabel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Vrabel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Vrabel Line = papers co-authored together Mark Vrabel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Hit paper breakdown →
2015495
2 202055
3 202042
4 202039
5 202026
6 201020
7 200418
8 202014
9 200713
10 202010
11 20208
12 20207
13 20167
14 20196
15 20054
16 20163
17 20023
18
Do Health Sciences Libraries and Librarians Have an Impact on the Cost of Health Care and Research? A Systematic Review
20150

About Mark Vrabel

Mark Vrabel is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 18 papers that have together received 770 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Nausea and vomiting management (1 paper), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (1 paper) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (8 citations), Research and Theory (4 citations), Oncology (78 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (63 citations) and Gastroenterology (14 citations). Mark Vrabel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Pamela Ginex, Rebecca L. Morgan, Margaret Bevans, Constance Visovsky, Marlene Z. Cohen, Betty Ferrell, L.A. McGee, Bonnie B. Lasinski, Mei R. Fu and Susan D Bruce. Their work appears in journals such as Oncology nursing forum, Clinical journal of oncology nursing, CIN Computers Informatics Nursing, Clinical Nurse Specialist and Home Health Care Management & Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact