Mark V. Smith
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
-
- Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus 2
- Nerve injury and regeneration 2
-
- Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments 4
- Co-authors
- Gerard S. Rodziewicz (3 shared papers)Charles J. Hodge (3 shared papers)Edward R. Laws (2 shared papers)Richard T. Kelley (2 shared papers)Robert M. Kellman (2 shared papers)A. Vania Apkarian (2 shared papers)Edward J. Donati (2 shared papers)Lloyd Guth (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neurosurgery (4 papers)Experimental Neurology (2 papers)Spine (1 paper)American Journal of Neuroradiology (1 paper)Journal of Neurophysiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Mark V. Smith
11 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Developmental Neuroscience 43
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 137
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 160
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 55
- Neurology 43
Countries citing papers authored by Mark V. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark V. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark V. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark V. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark V. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark V. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark V. Smith. The network helps show where Mark V. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mark V. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1985 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 55 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 42 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 20 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 12 | |
| 8 | Giant cervical epidural veins after craniectomy for head trauma. | 1998 | 11 |
| 9 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 11 | Determining NFIRS Reporting Accuracy by Alachua County Fire Rescue Company Officers | 2007 | 1 |
| 12 | 1998 | 0 |
About Mark V. Smith
Mark V. Smith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (2 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (2 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Fire Detection and Safety Systems (1 paper) and Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (43 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (137 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (160 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (55 citations) and Neurology (43 citations). Mark V. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gerard S. Rodziewicz, Charles J. Hodge, Edward R. Laws, Richard T. Kelley, Robert M. Kellman, A. Vania Apkarian, Edward J. Donati, Lloyd Guth, Charles P. Barrett and Freedolph D. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Experimental Neurology, Spine, American Journal of Neuroradiology and Journal of Neurophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.