Mark V. Smith
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
-
- Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
- Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Papers in
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration 2
- Surgery 3
- Co-authors
- Gerard S. Rodziewicz (2 shared papers)Charles J. Hodge (3 shared papers)Edward R. Laws (2 shared papers)Robert M. Kellman (1 shared paper)Richard T. Kelley (1 shared paper)A. Vania Apkarian (2 shared papers)Lloyd Guth (2 shared papers)Edward J. Donati (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neurosurgery (4 papers)Experimental Neurology (2 papers)American Journal of Neuroradiology (1 paper)Journal of Neurophysiology (1 paper)Brain Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark V. Smith
10 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Developmental Neuroscience 39
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 155
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 153
- Neurology 57
- Surgery 144
Countries citing papers authored by Mark V. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark V. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark V. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark V. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark V. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark V. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark V. Smith. The network helps show where Mark V. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mark V. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 71 | |
| 3 | 1985 | 61 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 39 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 20 | |
| 7 | Giant cervical epidural veins after craniectomy for head trauma. | 1998 | 11 |
| 8 | 1992 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 5 |
About Mark V. Smith
Mark V. Smith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 10 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (2 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (39 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (155 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (153 citations), Neurology (57 citations) and Surgery (144 citations). Mark V. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerard S. Rodziewicz, Charles J. Hodge, Edward R. Laws, Robert M. Kellman, Richard T. Kelley, A. Vania Apkarian, Lloyd Guth, Edward J. Donati, Charles P. Barrett and Freedolph D. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Experimental Neurology, American Journal of Neuroradiology, Journal of Neurophysiology and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.