Mark Tooley

1.2k citations
43 papers · 910 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Tooley

43 papers receiving 856 citations

Peers

Mark Tooley
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 102
  • Physiology 358
  • Developmental Neuroscience 37
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 268
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 34
Replace Stanley J. Stamm with:
Stanley J. Stamm United States
C. Veriter Belgium
William H Spivey United States
Luis Gaitini Israel
Raezelle Zinman Canada
Ravi Mahajan United Kingdom
Patrick K. Birmingham United States
Joel B. Gunter United States
T.J.H. Clark United Kingdom
Marinella Astuto Italy
Mark Tooley relative to Stanley J. Stamm United States Stanley J. Stamm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stanley J. Stamm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Tooley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Tooley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Tooley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Tooley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Tooley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Tooley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Tooley. The network helps show where Mark Tooley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Tooley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Tooley Line = papers co-authored together Mark Tooley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978147
2 197885
3 198670
4 199068
5 200752
6 199450
7 200644
8 201742
9 197733
10 197928
11 198124
12 199621
13 198418
14 197918
15
Quantitative surface EMG in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders.
200216
16 199514
17 200413
18 201912
19 202112
20 199410

About Mark Tooley

Mark Tooley is a scholar working on Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 910 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asthma and respiratory diseases (11 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (4 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (4 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (102 citations), Physiology (358 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (37 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (268 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (34 citations). Mark Tooley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include S. Godfrey, A T Edmunds, L Balfour‐Lynn, C. PRYS‐ROBERTS, F.C. Forrest, R J Wainwright, Andrew Wolf, Gareth C. Thorne, Peter R. Saunders and M.F. D'Souza. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Archives of Disease in Childhood, European Journal of Anaesthesiology and Thorax.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact