Mark Thomas Smith

141 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Mark Thomas Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
  • Automotive Engineering 498
  • Nephrology 272
  • Hematology 405
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 597
  • Genetics 231
Replace Yi Gong with:
Yi Gong China
Takuro Yonezawa Japan
Julie A. Adams United States
GuoPing WANG China
Li Liu China
Hao Wang China
Tao Xu China
Nian Zhang United States
Boxuan Simen Zhao China
Hui Yuan Xiong China
Mark Thomas Smith relative to Yi Gong China Yi Gong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.6×
Yi Gong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Thomas Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Thomas Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Thomas Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Thomas Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Thomas Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Thomas Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Thomas Smith. The network helps show where Mark Thomas Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Thomas Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Thomas Smith Line = papers co-authored together Mark Thomas Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 149 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993236
2 2011195
3 2009167
4 2010159
5 2014155
6 2006152
7 2015129
8 2017118
9 2013105
10 2013100
11 201498
12 200889
13 200988
14 201479
15 201773
16 200670
17 202065
18 201064
19 201859
20 200154

About Mark Thomas Smith

Mark Thomas Smith is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Automotive Engineering, having authored 149 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metallurgy and Material Forming (16 papers), Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (15 papers), Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (10 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (10 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (9 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (8 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (7 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (498 citations), Nephrology (272 citations), Hematology (405 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (597 citations) and Genetics (231 citations). Mark Thomas Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bradley Charles Bundy, Monson H. Hayes III, Amol Borkar, Jo Crotty, Amin S. M. Salehi, Richard M. DeGraaf, John P. Buonaccorsi, David I. King, Wajeh Y. Qunibi and G.J. Grant. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Biotechnology Progress, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A and Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact