Mark Tedder

933 citations
16 papers · 687 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Tedder

15 papers receiving 651 citations

Peers

Mark Tedder
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Infectious Diseases 306
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 248
  • Epidemiology 240
  • Small Animals 55
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 24
Replace Anneli Piilonen with:
Anneli Piilonen Finland
R. Darryl Fisher United States
Paul C. Stillwell United States
Bruce Maycher Canada
Eugene M. Breznock United States
M. Carby United Kingdom
Franziska Bernet Switzerland
Albert E. Heurich United States
Fernando Verra France
Karl P. Klassen United States
Mark Tedder relative to Anneli Piilonen Finland Anneli Piilonen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Anneli Piilonen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Tedder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Tedder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Tedder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Tedder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Tedder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Tedder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Tedder. The network helps show where Mark Tedder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Tedder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Tedder Line = papers co-authored together Mark Tedder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1994329
2 1992165
3 200281
4 199340
5 199728
6 199119
7 19926
8 19934
9
Use of Toronto stentless porcine valve in patients with aortic dilation.
19994
10 19923
11 19923
12 19932
13 19921
14 19931
15
Myocardial tolerance to ischemia after resuscitation. Direct mechanical ventricular actuation versus cardiopulmonary bypass.
19921
16 20020

About Mark Tedder

Mark Tedder is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 687 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (6 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (5 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (4 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (2 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (306 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (248 citations), Epidemiology (240 citations), Small Animals (55 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (24 citations). Mark Tedder has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark P. Anstadt, Sanjay S. Hegde, James E. Lowe, John A. Spratt, James E. Lowe, Barbara J. Crain, William C. Alford, William H. Coltharp, Lynne A. Skaryak and Steven J. Hoff. Their work appears in journals such as ASAIO Journal, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and Annals of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact