Mark T. Powell
Impact in
- Inorganic Chemistry top 5%
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
Papers in
-
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 3
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 3
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 1
- Click Chemistry and Applications 1
-
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis 4
- Co-authors
- Kevin Burgess (4 shared papers)Marc C. Perry (2 shared papers)Duen‐Ren Hou (2 shared papers)Joseph H. Reibenspies (1 shared paper)Michael T. Crimmins (1 shared paper)Alexander M. Porte (2 shared papers)Joe Reibenspies (1 shared paper)Karen Carroll (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (4 papers)Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (1 paper)MedChemComm (1 paper)Tetrahedron (1 paper)Chemical Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark T. Powell
8 papers receiving 718 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Inorganic Chemistry 339
- Organic Chemistry 647
- Process Chemistry and Technology 47
- Pharmaceutical Science 22
- Biotechnology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Mark T. Powell
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark T. Powell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark T. Powell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark T. Powell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark T. Powell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark T. Powell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark T. Powell. The network helps show where Mark T. Powell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Mark T. Powell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 380 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 216 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 4 |
About Mark T. Powell
Mark T. Powell is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Physiology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (4 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (3 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (2 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (1 paper), Click Chemistry and Applications (1 paper) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (339 citations), Organic Chemistry (647 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (47 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (22 citations) and Biotechnology (27 citations). Mark T. Powell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Burgess, Marc C. Perry, Duen‐Ren Hou, Joseph H. Reibenspies, Michael T. Crimmins, Alexander M. Porte, Joe Reibenspies, Karen Carroll, Nathaniel Wallace and Stefanie Rassnick. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, MedChemComm, Tetrahedron and Chemical Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.