Mark Stringer

412 citations
15 papers · 277 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Stringer

14 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

Mark Stringer
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Human-Computer Interaction 148
  • Computer Science Applications 41
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 18
  • Information Systems 44
Replace Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues with:
Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues Brazil
Isabel Pedersen Canada
Miso Kim United States
Jan Derboven Belgium
Ben Jelen United States
Marguerite Barry Ireland
Oronzo Parlangeli Italy
Britta Schulte Germany
Lucila Ishitani Brazil
Hiroshi Horii United States
Mark Stringer relative to Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues Brazil Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Stringer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Stringer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Stringer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Stringer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Stringer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Stringer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Stringer. The network helps show where Mark Stringer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Stringer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Stringer Line = papers co-authored together Mark Stringer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200957
2 200336
3 200636
4 200428
5 201727
6 200425
7 201816
8 200514
9 200513
10 200612
11 19927
12 20194
13 20071
14 20161
15
Organisations, race and trauma
20200

About Mark Stringer

Mark Stringer is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computer Science Applications, having authored 15 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (2 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (2 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (2 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (2 papers) and Green IT and Sustainability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (148 citations), Computer Science Applications (41 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (18 citations) and Information Systems (44 citations). Mark Stringer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer A. Rode, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Alan F. Blackwell, Eleanor F. Toye, Eric Harris, Eva Hornecker, John Halloran, Albrecht Schmidt, Dagmar Kern and Walter W. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Pervasive Computing, Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, CoDesign, Counselor Education and Supervision and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact