Mark Strauss

3.4k citations
58 papers · 2.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Strauss

53 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Mark Strauss
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 438
  • Statistics and Probability 260
  • Clinical Psychology 373
Replace Linda Pring with:
Linda Pring United Kingdom
Pamela Heaton United Kingdom
Genevieve McArthur Australia
Danielle Ropar United Kingdom
N. O’Connor United Kingdom
Julia L. Evans United States
Teodora Gliga United Kingdom
Beate Hermelin United Kingdom
Édouard Gentaz France
Lucy A. Henry United Kingdom
Mark Strauss relative to Linda Pring United Kingdom Linda Pring's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Linda Pring · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Strauss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Strauss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Strauss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Strauss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Strauss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Strauss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Strauss. The network helps show where Mark Strauss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Strauss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Strauss Line = papers co-authored together Mark Strauss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009282
2 1981254
3 2017253
4 2013235
5 1979194
6 1979188
7 1979179
8 1979149
9 200688
10 197578
11 201162
12 201660
13 197859
14 200953
15 201852
16 201048
17 201243
18 198343
19 201136
20 201130

About Mark Strauss

Mark Strauss is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Education, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (17 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (8 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (8 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (5 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (4 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (438 citations), Statistics and Probability (260 citations) and Clinical Psychology (373 citations). Mark Strauss has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Leslie B. Cohen, Nancy J. Minshew, L. Curtis, Holly Zajac Gastgeb, Keiran Rump, Joyce Giovannelli, Judy S. DeLoache, Antonio Y. Hardan, Eric A. Youngstrom and Thomas Frazier. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Child Development, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact