Mark Stone

1.9k citations
50 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Stone

44 papers receiving 914 citations

Peers

Mark Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 513
  • Finance 571
  • Computer Science Applications 271
  • Economics and Econometrics 356
  • Communication 80
Replace Michael Halling with:
Michael Halling Austria
Tim Koller United States
Jeremy Hayes Ireland
Michael C. S. Wong Hong Kong
Motty Perry Israel
Pablo Azar United States
Qing He China
J. Gregory Sidak United States
Daniel D. Garcia‐Swartz United States
Marc Bourreau France
Mark Stone relative to Michael Halling Austria Michael Halling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
Michael Halling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Stone. The network helps show where Mark Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Stone Line = papers co-authored together Mark Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution
1999421
2 200587
3 200570
4 200463
5 200263
6 200960
7 200434
8 200331
9 200228
10 200328
11 200425
12 200923
13 199120
14 199320
15 199920
16 199816
17 200016
18 201114
19 200414
20 201113

About Mark Stone

Mark Stone is a scholar working on Finance, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and Strategy and Management, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Financial Crisis and Policies (36 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (19 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (15 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (14 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (4 papers), State Capitalism and Financial Governance (3 papers) and Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (513 citations), Finance (571 citations), Computer Science Applications (271 citations), Economics and Econometrics (356 citations) and Communication (80 citations). Mark Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Chris DiBona, Scott Roger, Alina Carare, E. Philip Davis, Andrea Schaechter, Étienne B. Yehoue, Michael P. Dooley, Prakash Loungani, Kalpana Kochhar and Melvyn Weeks. Their work appears in journals such as Emergency Medicine Journal, Journal of International Money and Finance, Occasional paper, Journal of Financial Stability and Finance & development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact