Mark Stephen Thomas

2.4k citations
69 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Stephen Thomas

67 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Mark Stephen Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Endocrinology 334
  • Molecular Medicine 144
  • Microbiology 136
  • Genetics 613
  • Molecular Biology 956
Replace Gwennaele A. Fichant with:
Gwennaele A. Fichant France
Sören Abel United States
M S Strom United States
Yaara Oppenheimer‐Shaanan Israel
Xhavit Zogaj United States
Emily J. Stevens United Kingdom
Jean‐Claude Lazzaroni France
Anja Brenčič United States
Phillip D. Aldridge United Kingdom
Zachary D. Dalebroux United States
Mark Stephen Thomas relative to Gwennaele A. Fichant France Gwennaele A. Fichant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gwennaele A. Fichant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Stephen Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Stephen Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Stephen Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Stephen Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Stephen Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Stephen Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Stephen Thomas. The network helps show where Mark Stephen Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Stephen Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Stephen Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Mark Stephen Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007203
2 2017130
3 1990119
4 200679
5 200777
6 201776
7 199173
8 201065
9 198759
10 200256
11 198755
12 200254
13 200150
14 201346
15 200045
16 201444
17 200337
18 201836
19 200236
20 199233

About Mark Stephen Thomas

Mark Stephen Thomas is a scholar working on Genetics, Endocrinology, Molecular Biology, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (33 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (23 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (15 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (13 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (6 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (6 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (5 papers) and Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (334 citations), Molecular Medicine (144 citations), Microbiology (136 citations), Genetics (613 citations) and Molecular Biology (956 citations). Mark Stephen Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan G. Shaw, Richard Bailey Flavell, Robert E. Glass, Michio Nomura, Grzegorz Węgrzyn, Andrew William Heath, Adele McCormick, Eric Cascalès, Stephen J. W. Busby and Marie‐Stéphanie Aschtgen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Microbiology, BioMetals, Journal of Molecular Biology and Nucleic Acids Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact