Mark Stehr

21 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers

Mark Stehr
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • General Decision Sciences 37
  • Applied Psychology 57
  • General Health Professions 176
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 69
  • Health 45
Replace Robert Galvin with:
Robert Galvin United States
Don Kenkel United States
M. Christopher Auld Canada
Margo Dijkstra Netherlands
David Yokum United States
Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu Mexico
Jennifer Cantrell United States
Claire Wilkinson Australia
Fiona Dobbie United Kingdom
Richard A. Dunn United States
Mark Stehr relative to Robert Galvin United States Robert Galvin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Robert Galvin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Stehr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Stehr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Stehr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Stehr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Stehr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Stehr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Stehr. The network helps show where Mark Stehr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Stehr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Stehr Line = papers co-authored together Mark Stehr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006123
2 2007119
3 200495
4 200758
5 201740
6 201835
7 200732
8 201729
9 201229
10 201920
11 201120
12 201019
13 201819
14 201915
15 201714
16 201012
17 201710
18 20177
19 20216
20
How are Preferences For Commitment Revealed
20194

About Mark Stehr

Mark Stehr is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 708 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (37 citations), Applied Psychology (57 citations), General Health Professions (176 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (69 citations) and Health (45 citations). Mark Stehr has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mozambique and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christopher S. Carpenter, Heather Royer, Justin Sydnor, Ndola Prata, Farnaz Vahidnia, Leo Morris, Amy H. Auchincloss, David M. Kern, Genevieve P. Kanter and Lucy Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health Economics, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, The Journal of Law and Economics, The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy and European Journal of Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact