Mark Schoor

1.6k citations
85 papers · 1.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Schoor

84 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Mark Schoor
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.2k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 583
  • Aerospace Engineering 399
  • Materials Chemistry 370
  • Radiation 46
Replace L.W. Yan with:
L.W. Yan China
J. F. Lyon United States
Akimitsu NISHIZAWA Japan
Bryan McCormack United States
Xiang Han China
Taik Soo Hahm South Korea
D. R. Roberts United States
Tongnyeol Rhee South Korea
Akihiro Ishizawa Japan
K. Hoshino Japan
Mark Schoor relative to L.W. Yan China L.W. Yan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
L.W. Yan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Schoor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Schoor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Schoor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Schoor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Schoor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Schoor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Schoor. The network helps show where Mark Schoor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Schoor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Schoor Line = papers co-authored together Mark Schoor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003117
2 201787
3 201384
4 200674
5 202163
6 201356
7 200749
8 202148
9 201347
10 199946
11 200739
12 201037
13 201436
14 201130
15 201229
16 200927
17 201324
18 201023
19 201123
20 201721

About Mark Schoor

Mark Schoor is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (67 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (29 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (22 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (18 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (17 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (15 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (14 papers) and Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.2k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (583 citations), Aerospace Engineering (399 citations), Materials Chemistry (370 citations) and Radiation (46 citations). Mark Schoor has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Maarten Vergote, S. Jachmich, Guido VAN OOST, R. Weynants, R.R. Weynants, C. Hidalgo, Yan Ling Xu, Andreas Krämer-Flecken, Yuhong Xu and P. Dumortier. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Fusion Engineering and Design, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Journal of Nuclear Materials and Physics of Plasmas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact