Mark Rilling

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mark Rilling
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 726
  • Statistics and Probability 259
  • Small Animals 203
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 464
  • Animal Science and Zoology 244
Replace Peter Harzem with:
Peter Harzem United States
Marc N. Branch United States
W. N. Schoenfeld United States
Norman Guttman United States
H. M. Jenkins Canada
Stephen F. Sands United States
Richard L. Shull United States
James A. Dinsmoor United States
Donald A. Riley United States
Douglas S. Grant Canada
Mark Rilling relative to Peter Harzem United States Peter Harzem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Peter Harzem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Rilling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Rilling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Rilling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Rilling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Rilling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Rilling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Rilling. The network helps show where Mark Rilling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Mark Rilling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Rilling Line = papers co-authored together Mark Rilling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970163
2 1965123
3 196597
4 196796
5 196976
6 196455
7 198747
8 198145
9 198138
10 197236
11 197333
12 198029
13 198727
14 198123
15 199623
16 198722
17 197319
18 197218
19 197016
20 197615

About Mark Rilling

Mark Rilling is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistics and Probability, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (29 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (19 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (16 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (6 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (726 citations), Statistics and Probability (259 citations), Small Animals (203 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (464 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (244 citations). Mark Rilling has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Krämer, Colin G. McDiarmid, Julie J. Neiworth, Donald F. Kendrick, Ralph W. Richards, J. Eric Ahlskog, Charles S. Watson, Walter T. Bourbon, Charles H. Brown and Richard Howard. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Learning and Motivation, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior and ˜The œPsychology of learning and motivation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact