Mark Richter

5.6k citations
95 papers · 5.1k · 1 hit paper · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Richter

90 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Mark Richter's Hit Papers

Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) 2004 · 2.4k citations
2.4k0+7+14Years since publication50010001.5k2.0k

Peers

Mark Richter
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Electrochemistry 1.8k
  • Molecular Biology 3.5k
  • Bioengineering 245
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.6k
  • Materials Chemistry 1.5k
Replace Conor F. Hogan with:
Conor F. Hogan Australia
Yanbing Zu Hong Kong
Bilha Willner Israel
Mei‐Jin Li China
Enrico Rampazzo Italy
Yingzi Fu China
Chenghong Lei China
Mahmut Durmuş Türkiye
Vefa Ahsen Türkiye
Ruizhuo Ouyang China
Mark Richter relative to Conor F. Hogan Australia Conor F. Hogan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Conor F. Hogan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Richter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Richter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Richter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Richter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Richter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Richter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Richter. The network helps show where Mark Richter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Richter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Richter Line = papers co-authored together Mark Richter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Electrochemiluminescence (ECL)
Hit paper breakdown →
20042401
2 1999190
3 2002165
4 1990132
5 2007120
6 2003110
7 1998109
8 2000109
9 199494
10 200185
11 200077
12 199676
13 200173
14 199672
15 200164
16 199360
17 200355
18 201351
19 202049
20 199247

About Mark Richter

Mark Richter is a scholar working on Electrochemistry, Archeology, Conservation, Molecular Biology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 95 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (33 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (30 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (15 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (12 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (10 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (10 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (10 papers) and Conducting polymers and applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (1.8k citations), Molecular Biology (3.5k citations), Bioengineering (245 citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.6k citations) and Materials Chemistry (1.5k citations). Mark Richter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karen J. Brewer, Brian D. Muegge, David A. Bruce, Allen J. Bard, Craig J. Alexander, Scott Workman, John L McCall, Radha Pyati, David J. Vinyard and Won Bae Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Inorganica Chimica Acta, The Analyst, Inorganic Chemistry and Analytica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact