Mark Rapley

71 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Mark Rapley
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Language and Linguistics 541
  • Safety Research 365
  • Gender Studies 297
  • Clinical Psychology 518
  • Health 156
Replace Keith Tuffin with:
Keith Tuffin New Zealand
J. Amos Hatch United States
Stephanie Taylor United Kingdom
Ivana Marková United Kingdom
Rivka Tuval‐Mashiach Israel
Molly Andrews United Kingdom
Erica Burman United Kingdom
Eva Feder Kittay United States
Lala Carr Steelman United States
Harry Daniels United Kingdom
Mark Rapley relative to Keith Tuffin New Zealand Keith Tuffin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Keith Tuffin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Rapley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Rapley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Rapley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Rapley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Rapley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Rapley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Rapley. The network helps show where Mark Rapley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Rapley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Rapley Line = papers co-authored together Mark Rapley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Quality of life research a critical introduction
2003217
2 2004195
3
How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods
2002154
4 1999121
5 2000118
6 2006112
7 2007101
8 199897
9 201091
10 199691
11 199887
12 199658
13 199855
14 200555
15 199652
16 201151
17 200350
18 200348
19 200148
20 199638

About Mark Rapley

Mark Rapley is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Social Psychology, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (22 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (7 papers), Social Representations and Identity (6 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (5 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (4 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (541 citations), Safety Research (365 citations), Gender Studies (297 citations), Clinical Psychology (518 citations) and Health (156 citations). Mark Rapley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Charles Antaki, A. McHoul, Stephen Beyer, Alec McHoul, Martha Augoustinos, Susan Hansen, Susan Hansen, Keith Tuffin, Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra and Joanna Moncrieff. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Social Psychology, Discourse & Society, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology and Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact