Mark Pemberton

1.4k citations
50 papers · 907 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Pemberton

48 papers receiving 875 citations

Peers

Mark Pemberton
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Dermatology 107
  • Small Animals 88
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 134
  • Chemical Health and Safety 6
  • Pollution 101
Replace Michaela Aufderheide with:
Michaela Aufderheide Germany
Kristen Helgeland Norway
Jan Tore Samuelsen Norway
Dorthe Arenholt‐Bindslev Denmark
Atsushi Shibata Japan
Annesofie Faurschou Denmark
Adam Hermanowicz Poland
Margot Lundborg Sweden
Robert J. Kaplan United States
Jana Tulinská Slovakia
Mark Pemberton relative to Michaela Aufderheide Germany Michaela Aufderheide's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Michaela Aufderheide · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pemberton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pemberton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pemberton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pemberton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pemberton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pemberton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pemberton. The network helps show where Mark Pemberton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pemberton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Pemberton Line = papers co-authored together Mark Pemberton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993105
2 201487
3 201152
4 201852
5 199842
6 198838
7 198637
8 199837
9 199935
10 199632
11 199731
12 202427
13 201722
14 201422
15 199619
16 199619
17 198816
18 202116
19 202316
20 200515

About Mark Pemberton

Mark Pemberton is a scholar working on Dermatology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Small Animals, having authored 50 papers that have together received 907 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (15 papers), Occupational exposure and asthma (10 papers), Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (7 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (7 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (5 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (5 papers) and Peripheral Artery Disease Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (107 citations), Small Animals (88 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (134 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (6 citations) and Pollution (101 citations). Mark Pemberton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include G.J.A. Oliver, Ian Kimber, N J M London, George M. Anderson, G D Ross, Václav Větvička, David E. Justus, S. Nydahl, Larry S. Andrews and P.R.F. Bell. Their work appears in journals such as Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Critical Reviews in Toxicology, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and British journal of surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact