Mark Pemberton

33 papers receiving 598 citations

Peers

Mark Pemberton
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Dermatology 157
  • Small Animals 130
  • Chemical Health and Safety 11
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 111
  • Pollution 82
Replace Stephen D. Gettings with:
Stephen D. Gettings United States
David Asturiol Italy
Julia Scheel Germany
Christa Hennes United States
J. Pauluhn Germany
Rob Roggeband Belgium
Clive S. Roper United Kingdom
E. Panteri Belgium
John F. Garrod United Kingdom
Harald Schlatter Germany
Mark Pemberton relative to Stephen D. Gettings United States Stephen D. Gettings's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18.5×
Stephen D. Gettings · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pemberton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pemberton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pemberton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pemberton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pemberton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pemberton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pemberton. The network helps show where Mark Pemberton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pemberton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Pemberton Line = papers co-authored together Mark Pemberton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017119
2 201160
3 201857
4 198847
5 198646
6 202443
7 201426
8 201726
9 199119
10 198517
11 202117
12 202216
13 202316
14 198613
15 200513
16 201413
17 201713
18 199110
19 201310
20 202410

About Mark Pemberton

Mark Pemberton is a scholar working on Dermatology, Cancer Research, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Small Animals and Food Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (10 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (10 papers), Occupational exposure and asthma (8 papers), Agricultural safety and regulations (7 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (4 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (4 papers) and Environmental Chemistry and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (157 citations), Small Animals (130 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (11 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (111 citations) and Pollution (82 citations). Mark Pemberton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerard J. A. OLIVER, Ian Kimber, Larry S. Andrews, Jonathan B Borak, Robert G. Ellis‐Hutchings, Heinz‐Peter Gelbke, Todd Gouin, Marcy I. Banton, Edgar Leibold and Ralf Eisert. Their work appears in journals such as Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Critical Reviews in Toxicology, Particle and Fibre Toxicology and Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact