Mark Oppenhuizen

696 citations
11 papers · 501 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Insect and Pesticide Research
    • Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
    • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
    • Genetically Modified Organisms Research
    • Insect Pest Control Strategies

Papers in

Mark Oppenhuizen

11 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

Mark Oppenhuizen
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Insect Science 218
  • Plant Science 253
  • Molecular Biology 371
  • Biotechnology 35
  • Organic Chemistry 84
Replace Kimitoshi Umeda with:
Kimitoshi Umeda Japan
Michele Bertazzini Italy
Hideki Uneme Japan
Takayuki Ainai Japan
Joanna Bajsa‐Hirschel United States
Regina Dick Germany
Jeffrey A. Haas United States
Walter Kunz Switzerland
Yan Du China
Mark Oppenhuizen relative to Kimitoshi Umeda Japan Kimitoshi Umeda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Kimitoshi Umeda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Oppenhuizen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Oppenhuizen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Oppenhuizen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Oppenhuizen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Oppenhuizen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Oppenhuizen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Oppenhuizen. The network helps show where Mark Oppenhuizen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Oppenhuizen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Oppenhuizen Line = papers co-authored together Mark Oppenhuizen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2001150
2 2008113
3 198065
4 200841
5
Seasonal Cry1Ac levels in DP50B: the "Bollgard® basis" for Bollgard II.
200029
6
Bollgard II efficacy: quantification of total lepidopteran activity in a 2-gene product.
200028
7 198328
8 198718
9 197814
10 20108
11 19917

About Mark Oppenhuizen

Mark Oppenhuizen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Insect Science, Organic Chemistry and Pollution, having authored 11 papers that have together received 501 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Resistance and Genetics (4 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (2 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (1 paper), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (1 paper), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (1 paper), Agricultural pest management studies (1 paper) and Genetically Modified Organisms Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (218 citations), Plant Science (253 citations), Molecular Biology (371 citations), Biotechnology (35 citations) and Organic Chemistry (84 citations). Mark Oppenhuizen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John T. Greenplate, Frederick J. Perlak, R. D. Voth, James K. Roberts, Karen S. Gustafson, J. W. Mullins, Sakuntala Sivasupramaniam, William J. Moar, Robert C. Elliott and Michael P. Doyle. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Entomology, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, The Plant Journal and Crop Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact