Mark Nesbitt

1.7k citations
53 papers · 868 · h-index 16

Impact in

    • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Archeology top 1%
    • Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
    • Ancient Near East History
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies

Papers in

Mark Nesbitt

47 papers receiving 788 citations

Peers

Mark Nesbitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Paleontology 239
  • Archeology 220
  • Geography, Planning and Development 83
  • Anthropology 107
  • Forestry 36
Replace Hongen Jiang with:
Hongen Jiang China
Charlene Murphy United Kingdom
Sarah Ivorra France
Soultana-Maria Valamoti Greece
J. D. H. Lambert Canada
María Hopf Germany
Patricia J. Lyon United States
Donald Ugent United States
James A. Zeidler United States
Shahina A. Ghazanfar United Kingdom
Mark Nesbitt relative to Hongen Jiang China Hongen Jiang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Hongen Jiang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Nesbitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Nesbitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Nesbitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Nesbitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Nesbitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Nesbitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Nesbitt. The network helps show where Mark Nesbitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Nesbitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Nesbitt Line = papers co-authored together Mark Nesbitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006103
2 200284
3 201656
4 200953
5 199850
6 197649
7 198845
8 200240
9 199539
10 200036
11 201533
12 202032
13 200328
14 199327
15 201925
16 201715
17 201715
18 201314
19 200313
20 201212

About Mark Nesbitt

Mark Nesbitt is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Archeology, Paleontology and Molecular Biology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 868 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (6 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (5 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (4 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (4 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (4 papers) and Plant Diversity and Evolution (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (239 citations), Archeology (220 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (83 citations), Anthropology (107 citations) and Forestry (36 citations). Mark Nesbitt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Martin K. Jones, Luiz Fernando Cappa de Oliveira, Howell G. M. Edwards, Delwen Samuel, Eudes S. Velozo, Mélanie Broin, Henk Beentje, J.S. Siemonsma, Rowena Gale and I. N. Healey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Economic Botany, Anatolian Studies, The Analyst and Plants People Planet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact