Mark Nawrot
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 38
- Neural dynamics and brain function 9
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 15
- Co-authors
- Randolph Blake (5 shared papers)Matthew Rizzo (8 shared papers)Robert Sekuler (1 shared paper)Josef Zihl (1 shared paper)Dora E. Angelaki (1 shared paper)Gregory C. DeAngelis (1 shared paper)Jacob W. Nadler (1 shared paper)M. Rizzo (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Vision Research (18 papers)Journal of Vision (4 papers)Current Opinion in Ophthalmology (2 papers)Perception (2 papers)Visual Cognition (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Mark Nawrot
43 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Cognitive Neuroscience 952
- Ophthalmology 165
- Neurology 114
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 181
- Epidemiology 231
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Nawrot
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Nawrot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Nawrot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Nawrot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Nawrot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Nawrot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Nawrot. The network helps show where Mark Nawrot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Nawrot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 132 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 87 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 82 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 78 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 55 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 51 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 50 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 40 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 39 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 27 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 20 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 16 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 15 |
About Mark Nawrot
Mark Nawrot is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Neurology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (38 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (13 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (7 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (952 citations), Ophthalmology (165 citations), Neurology (114 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (181 citations) and Epidemiology (231 citations). Mark Nawrot has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Randolph Blake, Matthew Rizzo, Robert Sekuler, Josef Zihl, Dora E. Angelaki, Gregory C. DeAngelis, Jacob W. Nadler, M. Rizzo, Angela Thompson and R. Blake. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Journal of Vision, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Perception and Visual Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.