Mark Napier

1.5k citations
46 papers · 962 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

    • Urban and Rural Development Challenges 13
    • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies 6

Mark Napier

45 papers receiving 909 citations

Peers

Mark Napier
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Urban Studies 161
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 282
  • Oncology 287
  • Biotechnology 48
  • Law 43
Replace Mark Schneider with:
Mark Schneider United States
David Nelken Israel
Gregory S. Alexander United States
Jeffrey Lin United States
Carlos de la Torre Spain
Robert C. Stuart United Kingdom
Martin Jones Canada
Catherine Legrand Belgium
David Robinson United Kingdom
Richard L. Meyer United States
Mark Napier relative to Mark Schneider United States Mark Schneider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.1×
Mark Schneider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Napier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Napier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Napier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Napier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Napier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Napier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Napier. The network helps show where Mark Napier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Napier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Napier Line = papers co-authored together Mark Napier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996189
2
Antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy: efficacy and mechanism of action in colorectal carcinoma.
200092
3 200366
4 201363
5 199760
6 201050
7 201337
8 200235
9 200935
10 201733
11 201823
12 202123
13 201322
14 201821
15 202017
16 201316
17 201615
18 201914
19 202213
20 200812

About Mark Napier

Mark Napier is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Law and Surgery, having authored 46 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban and Rural Development Challenges (13 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (6 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (6 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (5 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (4 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers) and Malaria Research and Control (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (161 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (282 citations), Oncology (287 citations), Biotechnology (48 citations) and Law (43 citations). Mark Napier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard H. J. Beǵent, Martin Hoyle, Karina Landman, Katherine V. Gough, A. Graham Tipple, Louise Crathorne, Laura Hope‐Stone, Stephen M. Stribbling, Caroline J. Springer and Joanne L. Casey. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, British Journal of Cancer, Urban Forum and Value in Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact