Mark Napier

57 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mark Napier
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Urban Studies 203
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 286
  • Oncology 233
  • Biotechnology 55
  • Law 60
Replace Hans Pruijt with:
Hans Pruijt Netherlands
Barbara Smith United States
Gregory S. Alexander United States
Barry Anderson United States
Mark Schneider United States
Michael Klein Austria
Roland Andersson Sweden
John C. Morris United States
Martin Jones Canada
Jeffrey Lin United States
Mark Napier relative to Hans Pruijt Netherlands Hans Pruijt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Hans Pruijt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Napier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Napier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Napier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Napier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Napier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Napier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Napier. The network helps show where Mark Napier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Napier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Napier Line = papers co-authored together Mark Napier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996199
2
Antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy: efficacy and mechanism of action in colorectal carcinoma.
2000100
3 200374
4 199768
5 201365
6 201158
7 201056
8 200238
9 201337
10 201937
11 201735
12 200934
13 201325
14 201823
15 202123
16 201821
17 200919
18 202018
19 201318
20 201716

About Mark Napier

Mark Napier is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Law and Finance, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban and Rural Development Challenges (15 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (7 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (5 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers), Malaria Research and Control (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers) and Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (203 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (286 citations), Oncology (233 citations), Biotechnology (55 citations) and Law (60 citations). Mark Napier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard H. J. Beǵent, Martin Hoyle, Karina Landman, Katherine V. Gough, A. Graham Tipple, Louise Crathorne, Stephen M. Stribbling, Laura Hope‐Stone, Caroline J. Springer and Joanne L. Casey. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, British Journal of Cancer, CHEST Journal and Urban Forum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact