Mark Napier

953 citations
39 papers · 721 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Napier

38 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers

Mark Napier
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Urban Studies 176
  • Economics and Econometrics 146
  • Oncology 90
  • Biotechnology 17
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 75
Replace Mark Schneider with:
Mark Schneider United States
Vincent Renard France
Xueqiang Xu China
Ian A. Fraser United Kingdom
Lutz Schneider Germany
Tingting Lu China
Gary A. Johnson United States
Lynne Poole United Kingdom
Russell W. Smith United States
Mark Napier relative to Mark Schneider United States Mark Schneider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
Mark Schneider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Napier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Napier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Napier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Napier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Napier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Napier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Napier. The network helps show where Mark Napier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Napier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Napier Line = papers co-authored together Mark Napier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200370
2 199768
3 201365
4 201056
5 201748
6 200941
7 201338
8 201736
9 202126
10 201325
11 201823
12 201822
13 200919
14 202019
15 201317
16 202217
17 201916
18 201615
19 200814
20 199812

About Mark Napier

Mark Napier is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Economics and Econometrics, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Finance, having authored 39 papers that have together received 721 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban and Rural Development Challenges (15 papers), Malaria Research and Control (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (4 papers), Housing Market and Economics (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Local Economic Development and Planning (3 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (2 papers) and Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (176 citations), Economics and Econometrics (146 citations), Oncology (90 citations), Biotechnology (17 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (75 citations). Mark Napier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and India. Frequent co-authors include Martin Hoyle, Karina Landman, A. Graham Tipple, Katherine V. Gough, Louise Crathorne, Jaime Peters, Christopher Hyde, Paul Garner, Tracey Jones-Hughes and Chris Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Urban Forum, Value in Health and Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact