Mark M. Phillips
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.2%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Instrumentation top 1%
Papers in
-
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 254
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 51
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 39
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 25
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 9
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 2
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 12
- Co-authors
- Nicholas B. Suntzeff (80 shared papers)J. A. Baldwin (11 shared papers)Roberto J. Terlevich (2 shared papers)R. A. Schommer (10 shared papers)R. Kirshner (22 shared papers)A. V. Filippenko (15 shared papers)BRUNO LEIBUNDGUT (9 shared papers)M. Hamuy (54 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (131 papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (43 papers)The Astronomical Journal (37 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysics (29 papers)Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileDenmark
In The Last Decade
Mark M. Phillips
351 papers receiving 45.2k citations
Mark M. Phillips's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 45.2k
- Instrumentation 496
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.3k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 582
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 293
Countries citing papers authored by Mark M. Phillips
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark M. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark M. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark M. Phillips more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark M. Phillips
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark M. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark M. Phillips. The network helps show where Mark M. Phillips may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark M. Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 357 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant Hit paper breakdown → | 1998 | 14297 |
| 2 | Classification parameters for the emission-line spectra of extragalactic objects Hit paper breakdown → | 1981 | 4315 |
| 3 | The absolute magnitudes of Type IA supernovae Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 1615 |
| 4 | Cosmological Results from High‐zSupernovae Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 1356 |
| 5 | Improved Cosmological Constraints from New, Old, and Combined Supernova Data Sets Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 1165 |
| 6 | The High‐Z Supernova Search: Measuring Cosmic Deceleration and Global Curvature of the Universe Using Type Ia Supernovae Hit paper breakdown → | 1998 | 1104 |
| 7 | The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch* Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 665 |
| 8 | The Reddening-Free Decline Rate Versus Luminosity Relationship for Type [CLC]Ia[/CLC] Supernovae Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 635 |
| 9 | Supernova Limits on the Cosmic Equation of State Hit paper breakdown → | 1998 | 605 |
| 10 | Southern spectrophotometric standards, 2 Hit paper breakdown → | 1994 | 547 |
| 11 | Southern spectrophotometric standards. Hit paper breakdown → | 1992 | 539 |
| 12 | 1998 | 507 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 414 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 401 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 334 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 326 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 325 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 324 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 318 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 317 |
About Mark M. Phillips
Mark M. Phillips is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Civil and Structural Engineering and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 357 papers that have together received 46.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (254 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (51 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (39 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (25 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (12 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (9 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (6 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (45.2k citations), Instrumentation (496 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.3k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (582 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (293 citations). Mark M. Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas B. Suntzeff, J. A. Baldwin, Roberto J. Terlevich, R. A. Schommer, R. Kirshner, A. V. Filippenko, BRUNO LEIBUNDGUT, M. Hamuy, Brian P. Schmidt and P. Garnavich. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astronomical Journal, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.