Mark Layman
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 0.5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Risk Perception and Management 8
-
- Risk and Safety Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- Paul Slovic (7 shared papers)James H. Flynn (4 shared papers)Sarah Lichtenstein (2 shared papers)Barbara Harris Combs (1 shared paper)Baruch Fischhoff (2 shared papers)James Flynn (2 shared papers)James A. Chalmers (1 shared paper)N KRAUS (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Science (1 paper)Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development (1 paper)Risk Analysis (1 paper)Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon) (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark Layman
7 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Mark Layman's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- General Decision Sciences 453
- Applied Psychology 151
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 206
- Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 131
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Layman
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Layman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Layman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Layman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Layman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Layman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Layman. The network helps show where Mark Layman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mark Layman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Judged frequency of lethal events. Hit paper breakdown → | 1978 | 1059 |
| 2 | Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear Waste Hit paper breakdown → | 1991 | 534 |
| 3 | 1991 | 248 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 109 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 0 |
About Mark Layman
Mark Layman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, General Decision Sciences and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 8 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Risk Perception and Management (8 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (2 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (2 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (2 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (1 paper), Nuclear Issues and Defense (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (453 citations), Applied Psychology (151 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (206 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.1k citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (131 citations). Mark Layman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Slovic, James H. Flynn, Sarah Lichtenstein, Barbara Harris Combs, Baruch Fischhoff, James Flynn, James A. Chalmers, N KRAUS, Rob Goble and C. Hohenemser. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, Risk Analysis, Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon) and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.