Mark Laslett

40 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Mark Laslett
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.5k
  • Pharmacology 1.3k
  • Surgery 866
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 362
  • Cell Biology 216
Replace Richard E. Erhard with:
Richard E. Erhard United States
Annelies Pool‐Goudzwaard Netherlands
Maureen C. Jensen United States
Curtis W. Slipman United States
Todd F. Alamin United States
Richard Derby United States
S. Wiesel United States
Adam M. Pearson United States
Peter Fritzell Sweden
Paul Dreyfuss United States
Mark Laslett relative to Richard E. Erhard United States Richard E. Erhard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Richard E. Erhard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Laslett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Laslett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Laslett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Laslett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Laslett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Laslett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Laslett. The network helps show where Mark Laslett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Laslett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Laslett Line = papers co-authored together Mark Laslett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005405
2 2007300
3 2010224
4 2003219
5 2003215
6 1994205
7 2008188
8 2017110
9 2006107
10 2005107
11 201195
12 200480
13 201080
14 200477
15 200374
16 201171
17 200368
18 200566
19 200642
20 201032

About Mark Laslett

Mark Laslett is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 44 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (21 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (19 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (13 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers) and Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.5k citations), Pharmacology (1.3k citations), Surgery (866 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (362 citations) and Cell Biology (216 citations). Mark Laslett has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Charles N. Aprill, Barry McDonald, Sharon B. Young, Tom Petersen, Wayne Hing, Angela Cadogan, Birgitta Öberg, Peter J. McNair, Christopher G. Maher and Mark J. Hancock. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, The Spine Journal, Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine and European Spine Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact