Mark L. Walker

683 citations
27 papers · 494 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark L. Walker

23 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers

Mark L. Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 92
  • Artificial Intelligence 175
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 61
  • Oncology 40
  • Health Information Management 14
Replace Simon R. Turner with:
Simon R. Turner Canada
Denise Küster Germany
Moreno Ursino France
Gottfried Endel Austria
Ariel Alonso Belgium
Marzieh Vali United States
Marianne Heibert Arnlind Sweden
Siew F Chan Australia
Joy Shi United States
Michal Guindy Israel
Mark L. Walker relative to Simon R. Turner Canada Simon R. Turner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Simon R. Turner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark L. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark L. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark L. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark L. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark L. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark L. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark L. Walker. The network helps show where Mark L. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark L. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark L. Walker Line = papers co-authored together Mark L. Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009184
2 198665
3 200852
4 200843
5 201028
6 201119
7 199717
8 201215
9 200814
10 202212
11 201911
12 20168
13 20175
14 20174
15 20214
16 20243
17 19972
18 20202
19
The top 200 web sites for marketing
20001
20 20031

About Mark L. Walker

Mark L. Walker is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Neurology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Medical Laboratory Technology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 494 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (2 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (2 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (2 papers), Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (1 paper) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (92 citations), Artificial Intelligence (175 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (61 citations), Oncology (40 citations) and Health Information Management (14 citations). Mark L. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Tyson Roffey, Jim Bottomley, Khaled El Emam, Elise Cogo, Daniel Amyot, Elizabeth Jonker, Fida K. Dankar, Jean‐Pierre Corriveau, Régis Vaillancourt and Joel Rosenberg. Their work appears in journals such as The American Surgeon, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, Cancer, World Neurosurgery and American Journal of Perinatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact