Mark L. Stetz

611 citations
16 papers · 520 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark L. Stetz

15 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

Mark L. Stetz
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Biophysics 66
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 150
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 193
  • Internal Medicine 18
  • Building and Construction 54
Replace Lorenzo Leonardi with:
Lorenzo Leonardi Canada
Thomas B. Ivanc United States
Lars E. Olson United States
Angel L. Rosado United States
Dongsuk Shin United States
Rongli Zhang China
Jennifer B. Lisauskas United States
Michael E. Dunham United States
Yasser H. El-Sharkawy Egypt
Mark L. Stetz relative to Lorenzo Leonardi Canada Lorenzo Leonardi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Lorenzo Leonardi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark L. Stetz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark L. Stetz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark L. Stetz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark L. Stetz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark L. Stetz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark L. Stetz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark L. Stetz. The network helps show where Mark L. Stetz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Mark L. Stetz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark L. Stetz Line = papers co-authored together Mark L. Stetz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1990202
2
M&v guidelines: measurement and verification for federal energy projects, version 2.2
200059
3 198957
4 198940
5 198832
6 198925
7 199124
8 199318
9 198816
10 199114
11 199013
12 19929
13 19914
14
EVALUATION OF DISCRIMINANT MODELS AS CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR LASER ANGIOPLASTY.
19874
15 19923
16 19870

About Mark L. Stetz

Mark L. Stetz is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Internal Medicine, Biophysics and Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (7 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (4 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (4 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (2 papers) and Coronary Artery Anomalies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (66 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (150 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (193 citations), Internal Medicine (18 citations) and Building and Construction (54 citations). Mark L. Stetz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence I. Deckelbaum, Francis W. Cutruzzola, Kenneth M. O'Brien, Cyrus R. Kapadia, Rosa E. Enriquez, Gene R. Gindi, Arthur F. Gmitro, David Jump, Ellen Franconi and Chris Darken. Their work appears in journals such as Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Applied Optics, Gastroenterology and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact