Mark Kvale
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Genetics top 10%
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Genomics and Rare Diseases
Papers in
- Genetics 13
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 9
- Genomics and Rare Diseases 6
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities 4
- Co-authors
- Neil Risch (17 shared papers)Catherine Schaefer (14 shared papers)Eric Jorgenson (15 shared papers)Christoph E. Schreiner (2 shared papers)Thomas J. Hoffmann (13 shared papers)Yambazi Banda (9 shared papers)Hélène Choquet (7 shared papers)Pui–Yan Kwok (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Medicine & Research (3 papers)Communications Biology (2 papers)Nature Communications (2 papers)npj Genomic Medicine (1 paper)Biometrics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaPoland
In The Last Decade
Mark Kvale
28 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Ophthalmology 172
- Genetics 302
- Aging 15
- Sensory Systems 38
- Cognitive Neuroscience 120
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Kvale
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Kvale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Kvale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Kvale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Kvale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Kvale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Kvale. The network helps show where Mark Kvale may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Kvale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 173 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 121 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 114 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 114 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 103 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 91 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 73 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 6 |
About Mark Kvale
Mark Kvale is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Cancer Research, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (9 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (6 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (4 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (4 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (172 citations), Genetics (302 citations), Aging (15 citations), Sensory Systems (38 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (120 citations). Mark Kvale has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Neil Risch, Catherine Schaefer, Eric Jorgenson, Christoph E. Schreiner, Thomas J. Hoffmann, Yambazi Banda, Hélène Choquet, Pui–Yan Kwok, Jie Yin and Khanh K. Thai. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Medicine & Research, Communications Biology, Nature Communications, npj Genomic Medicine and Biometrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.