Mark James Rawle
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 2%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Frailty in Older Adults
- Family Practice top 5%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance
Papers in
-
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies 3
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 2
-
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 3
- Co-authors
- Marcus Richards (6 shared papers)Diana Kuh (4 shared papers)Daniel Davis (8 shared papers)Rachel Cooper (1 shared paper)Mine Orlu (1 shared paper)Rebecca Bendayan (1 shared paper)Andrew Wong (2 shared papers)Simon Brill (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Drugs & Aging (2 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia (1 paper)Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)BMC Geriatrics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Mark James Rawle
11 papers receiving 439 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 174
- Family Practice 77
- Psychiatry and Mental health 98
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 32
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Mark James Rawle
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark James Rawle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark James Rawle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark James Rawle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark James Rawle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark James Rawle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark James Rawle. The network helps show where Mark James Rawle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark James Rawle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 106 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 103 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 93 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 0 |
About Mark James Rawle
Mark James Rawle is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper) and Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (174 citations), Family Practice (77 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (98 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (32 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations). Mark James Rawle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Marcus Richards, Diana Kuh, Daniel Davis, Rachel Cooper, Mine Orlu, Rebecca Bendayan, Andrew Wong, Simon Brill, A. J. Larner and Sarah‐Naomi James. Their work appears in journals such as Drugs & Aging, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, BMJ Open and BMC Geriatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.