Mark J. Sacchetti

24 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Mark J. Sacchetti
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Pharmaceutical Science 127
  • Ceramics and Composites 42
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 56
  • Drug Discovery 1
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 35
Replace Tatsuhiko Miyata with:
Tatsuhiko Miyata Japan
Graham Power Ireland
Cesare Sinistri Italy
Nick Kozlovich Israel
Andrew P. Parker United Kingdom
George Rennie United Kingdom
J.C. Osborn Australia
Jens Reinisch Germany
Michael F. Froix United States
Cynthia Khoo Sweden
Mark J. Sacchetti relative to Tatsuhiko Miyata Japan Tatsuhiko Miyata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Tatsuhiko Miyata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Sacchetti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Sacchetti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Sacchetti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Sacchetti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Sacchetti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Sacchetti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Sacchetti. The network helps show where Mark J. Sacchetti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Sacchetti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark J. Sacchetti Line = papers co-authored together Mark J. Sacchetti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200072
2 200961
3 201949
4 199344
5 201226
6 199323
7 200622
8 199321
9 200419
10 201717
11 200217
12 200316
13 199814
14 201313
15 200811
16 20018
17 20006
18 19954
19 20014
20 20064

About Mark J. Sacchetti

Mark J. Sacchetti is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Ceramics and Composites and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 26 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallization and Solubility Studies (5 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (5 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (4 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (3 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (2 papers) and Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (127 citations), Ceramics and Composites (42 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (56 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (35 citations). Mark J. Sacchetti has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include George Zografi, Hyuk Yu, Elham Nejati, Kenneth L. Kearns, Mark Ediger, Kevin J. Dawson, Zhenxuan Chen, Lian Yu, Yuhui Li and Shenye Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, AAPS PharmSciTech, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Fusion Engineering and Design and Pharmaceutical Development and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact