Mark J. Lema

2.7k citations
75 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Mark J. Lema

71 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Mark J. Lema
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 675
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 112
  • Surgery 896
  • Physiology 450
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 290
Replace Chen‐Hwan Cherng with:
Chen‐Hwan Cherng Taiwan
Phillip O. Bridenbaugh United States
V. Martinez France
Monique A. H. Steegers Netherlands
Oscar A. de León-Casasola United States
G. O’Sullivan United Kingdom
Christian Jayr France
Christopher M. Bernards United States
M. Wattwil Sweden
Kok‐Yuen Ho Singapore
Mark J. Lema relative to Chen‐Hwan Cherng Taiwan Chen‐Hwan Cherng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Chen‐Hwan Cherng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Lema

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Lema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Lema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Lema more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Lema

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Lema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Lema. The network helps show where Mark J. Lema may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Lema, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark J. Lema Line = papers co-authored together Mark J. Lema links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010303
2 1994129
3 199497
4 199391
5 199690
6 199790
7 201068
8 199667
9 200366
10 199662
11 199454
12 199449
13 197749
14 199246
15 199439
16 199339
17 198937
18 199230
19 199228
20 199928

About Mark J. Lema

Mark J. Lema is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology and Neurology, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (25 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (24 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (11 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers), Medical History and Innovations (6 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (675 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (112 citations), Surgery (896 citations), Physiology (450 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (290 citations). Mark J. Lema has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Oscar A. de León-Casasola, Christopher Voscopoulos, Douglas R. Bacon, Brian M. Parker, Thomas C. Sist, Patricia Harrison, Gary Ruoff, Kathleen M. Foley, Frederick H. Hausheer and M Noya. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Anesthesiology, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia and Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact