Mark I. Reed
Impact in
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
- Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Papers in
- Oncology 5
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis 4
- Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms 1
-
- Cellular Mechanics and Interactions 3
- Co-authors
- Nancy L. Allbritton (6 shared papers)Christopher E. Sims (6 shared papers)Scott T. Magness (5 shared papers)Dulan B. Gunasekara (5 shared papers)Matthew DiSalvo (4 shared papers)Yuli Wang (3 shared papers)Scott J. Bultman (3 shared papers)Raehyun Kim (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Analytical Chemistry (2 papers)Biomaterials (1 paper)Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (1 paper)ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering (1 paper)Lab on a Chip (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark I. Reed
6 papers receiving 509 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Oncology 249
- Biomedical Engineering 355
- Cell Biology 67
- Gastroenterology 15
- Automotive Engineering 31
Countries citing papers authored by Mark I. Reed
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark I. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark I. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark I. Reed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark I. Reed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark I. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark I. Reed. The network helps show where Mark I. Reed may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mark I. Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 281 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 140 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 18 |
About Mark I. Reed
Mark I. Reed is a scholar working on Oncology, Cell Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 6 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Cells and Metastasis (4 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (3 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (3 papers), Infant Nutrition and Health (1 paper), Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications (1 paper), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (1 paper), Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research (1 paper) and Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (249 citations), Biomedical Engineering (355 citations), Cell Biology (67 citations), Gastroenterology (15 citations) and Automotive Engineering (31 citations). Mark I. Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nancy L. Allbritton, Christopher E. Sims, Scott T. Magness, Dulan B. Gunasekara, Matthew DiSalvo, Yuli Wang, Scott J. Bultman, Raehyun Kim, Jennifer Speer and Yu‐li Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering and Lab on a Chip.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.