Mark Houck
Impact in
- Archeology top 1%
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Law top 0.5%
- Legal processes and jurisprudence
Papers in
-
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods 41
- Law 42
- Legal processes and jurisprudence 39
- Co-authors
- Jay A. Siegel (34 shared papers)Paul J. Speaker (9 shared papers)Afzel Noore B (4 shared papers)Bruce Budowle (2 shared papers)Mayank Vatsa A (3 shared papers)Richa Singh (3 shared papers)Richard A. Riley (4 shared papers)Christian M. Crowder (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Forensic Science International Synergy (15 papers)Journal of Forensic Sciences (13 papers)Forensic Science International (4 papers)Science & Justice (3 papers)Journal of Clinical Investigation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mark Houck
120 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Archeology 217
- Law 241
- Safety Research 161
- Signal Processing 102
- Toxicology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Houck
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Houck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Houck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Houck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Houck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Houck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Houck. The network helps show where Mark Houck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Houck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 141 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 114 | |
| 2 | The need for a research culture in the forensic sciences | 2011 | 87 |
| 3 | 2013 | 81 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 75 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 69 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 52 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 41 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 39 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 37 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 29 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 28 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 18 | Skeletal trauma and the individualization of knife marks in bone. | 1998 | 24 |
| 19 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 19 |
About Mark Houck
Mark Houck is a scholar working on Safety Research, Law, Archeology, Toxicology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 141 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (41 papers), Legal processes and jurisprudence (39 papers), Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies (22 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (14 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (10 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (9 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (8 papers) and Management Systems and Quality Improvement (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (217 citations), Law (241 citations), Safety Research (161 citations), Signal Processing (102 citations) and Toxicology (62 citations). Mark Houck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jay A. Siegel, Paul J. Speaker, Afzel Noore B, Bruce Budowle, Mayank Vatsa A, Richa Singh, Richard A. Riley, Christian M. Crowder, Angi M. Christensen and Stephen D. Ousley. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International Synergy, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Forensic Science International, Science & Justice and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.