Mark Hosmer
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Papers in
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 4
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 2
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 1
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 1
-
- Scientific Research and Discoveries 1
- Co-authors
- Matt Hilton (4 shared papers)Nicola Mehrtens (4 shared papers)C. A. Collins (4 shared papers)Scott T. Kay (4 shared papers)Christopher J. Miller (4 shared papers)A. K. Romer (4 shared papers)E. J. Lloyd-Davies (4 shared papers)Andrew R. Liddle (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPortugalUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Hosmer
4 papers receiving 196 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
- Instrumentation 135
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 199
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 18
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 9
- Aging 1
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hosmer
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hosmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hosmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hosmer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hosmer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hosmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hosmer. The network helps show where Mark Hosmer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Mark Hosmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 90 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 4 |
About Mark Hosmer
Mark Hosmer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Instrumentation, Global and Planetary Change and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 4 papers that have together received 202 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (1 paper), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (1 paper), Scientific Research and Discoveries (1 paper), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (1 paper), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (135 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (199 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (18 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (9 citations) and Aging (1 citation). Mark Hosmer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matt Hilton, Nicola Mehrtens, C. A. Collins, Scott T. Kay, Christopher J. Miller, A. K. Romer, E. J. Lloyd-Davies, Andrew R. Liddle, S. A. Stanford and P. T. P. Viana. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.