Mark Holbrook

22 papers receiving 592 citations

Peers

Mark Holbrook
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 219
  • Small Animals 63
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 66
  • Virology 16
  • Molecular Biology 245
Replace Katayoun Derakhchan with:
Katayoun Derakhchan United States
Margaret E. McCann United States
Jennifer Pierson United States
Yutaka Tonomura Japan
John M. Bond United States
Eddy Vlaminckx Belgium
Matthias Hoch Switzerland
Giorgina Mangano Italy
John C.H. Steele United States
Sherry J. Morgan United States
Mark Holbrook relative to Katayoun Derakhchan United States Katayoun Derakhchan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Katayoun Derakhchan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Holbrook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Holbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Holbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Holbrook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Holbrook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Holbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Holbrook. The network helps show where Mark Holbrook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Holbrook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Holbrook Line = papers co-authored together Mark Holbrook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201180
2 201467
3 200860
4 201042
5 201340
6 199640
7 199639
8 200536
9 201132
10 200831
11 199630
12 202127
13 199125
14 200723
15 201921
16 201411
17 19898
18 20213
19 20222
20
NRC Licensing Strategy Development for the NGNP
20082

About Mark Holbrook

Mark Holbrook is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Small Animals, having authored 23 papers that have together received 621 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (6 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (4 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (3 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (219 citations), Small Animals (63 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (66 citations), Virology (16 citations) and Molecular Biology (245 citations). Mark Holbrook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Pierre Valentin, Susan J. Coker, Neil Gozzard, Thomas W. Beck, Brian D. Guth, David J. Gallacher, Noël Dybdal, Russell Wallis, Brian Roche and William S. Redfern. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Pharmacology, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, Biochemical Pharmacology and Clinical and Translational Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact