Mark Genuis
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Migration, Health and Trauma
- Health top 2%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Papers in
-
- Child Abuse and Trauma 4
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 1
- Health 2
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 2
- Co-authors
- Claudio Violato (4 shared papers)Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci (1 shared paper)Christopher Bagley (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Psychology (1 paper)American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis (1 paper)Journal of Child Sexual Abuse (1 paper)International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling (1 paper)Psychological Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark Genuis
7 papers receiving 948 citations
Mark Genuis's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Clinical Psychology 829
- Health 217
- Safety Research 168
- Gender Studies 126
- General Health Professions 196
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Genuis
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Genuis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Genuis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Genuis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Genuis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Genuis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Genuis. The network helps show where Mark Genuis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Mark Genuis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Meta-Analysis of the Published Research on the Effects of Child Sexual Abuse Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 883 |
| 2 | 1995 | 54 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 54 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 0 |
About Mark Genuis
Mark Genuis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (829 citations), Health (217 citations), Safety Research (168 citations), Gender Studies (126 citations) and General Health Professions (196 citations). Mark Genuis has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Claudio Violato, Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci and Christopher Bagley. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Psychology, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling and Psychological Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.