Mark Field

1.4k citations
25 papers · 201 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Field

21 papers receiving 198 citations

Peers

Mark Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 99
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 65
  • Genetics 41
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 1
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 2
Replace Radosław Dębiec with:
Radosław Dębiec United Kingdom
Changshun He China
Juha Hartikainen Finland
Jia-Ning Gu China
Satoki Fukae Japan
Takiy-Eddine Berrandou France
Lisa D.S. Bloomer United Kingdom
María Luisa Peña Peña Spain
Brogan Ashley United Kingdom
Enrique Moncada Spain
Mark Field relative to Radosław Dębiec United Kingdom Radosław Dębiec's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Radosław Dębiec · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Field. The network helps show where Mark Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Field Line = papers co-authored together Mark Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201851
2 202124
3 202123
4 201919
5 202211
6 201910
7 20218
8 20227
9 20226
10 20116
11 20225
12 20225
13 20225
14 20105
15 20174
16 20243
17 20213
18 20143
19 20231
20 20241

About Mark Field

Mark Field is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Genetics and Epidemiology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 201 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (13 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (9 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (4 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (2 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (99 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (65 citations), Genetics (41 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (1 citation) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (2 citations). Mark Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Riaz Akhtar, Jillian Madine, Hannah A. Davies, Manoj Kuduvalli, Francesco Torella, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Victoria McKay, Julia Dumfarth, Nick Cheshire and David Parry. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Amyloid, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Thrombosis and Haemostasis and Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact