Countries where authors publish in The Heart Surgery Forum
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Heart Surgery Forum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Heart Surgery Forum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Heart Surgery Forum more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Heart Surgery Forum
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Heart Surgery Forum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Heart Surgery Forum.
About The Heart Surgery Forum
The 1.9k papers published in The Heart Surgery Forum in the last decades have received a total of 10.6k indexed citations . Papers published in The Heart Surgery Forum usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (633 papers), Surgery (741 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (420 papers), Internal Medicine (31 papers) and Epidemiology (245 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (281 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (274 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (188 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (187 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (117 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (115 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (110 papers) and Cardiac tumors and thrombi (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Heart Surgery Forum are Curt G Tribble, Johannes O. Bonatti, Francis P. Sutter, Scott Goldman, Ömer Faruk Doğan, Francis D. Ferdinand, Borut Geršak, Paul Mikus, Gary M. Onik and Boris Rubinsky.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.